The Legal Aid Lawyer of the Year awards (the ‘LALYs’) organised by the Legal Aid Practitioners Group awards took place on the evening of 7th July 2020. Due to the coronavirus pandemic, this year’s awards took place remotely via YouTube. It was wonderful and rather awe inspiring to hear about the incredible work of so many committed legal aid practitioners working around the UK. CLP would like to congratulate all nominees and winners in the various categories.
On Friday 10th July 2020, Gypsy and Traveller campaign organisations celebrated at news that Harlow District Council have withdrawn their injunction against Traveller camps. In 2015, Harlow District Council and Essex County Council were the first local authorities to obtain an injunction protecting vast swathes of land in their areas against unauthorised encampments. Harlow District Council, with Essex County Council no longer taking an active part in the matter, sought variation of the injunction to continue it beyond its final date at a virtual hearing before Mrs. Justice Tipples on Friday 10th July 2020.
After writing to the Lord Chancellor about evictions of Gypsies and Travellers during lockdown, CLP have received a very unsatisfactory response. Please see the link below for the two letters. However our interpretation of the recent English and Welsh Guidance in the light of COVID-19 is that either evictions should not happen or suitable alternative locations should be identified. See our two TAT News E Bulletins on both sets of guidance:https://www.communitylawpartnership.co.uk/noticeboard/links/tat-news
Total Attachments: 2
Gypsy and Traveller support groups have for some time been pressing the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government to provide guidance regarding Gypsies and Travellers who are, through no fault of their own, on unauthorised encampments.
To assist in this process CLP have now produced suggested guidance.
Dear Lord Chancellor, Re: Eviction Actions against Gypsies and Travellers The Community Law Partnership is a Legal Aid firm, specialising in housing, public law, and community care. We have a specialist team which advises Gypsies and Travellers throughout England and…
We have seen reports on social media that CLP have said that no evictions can take place at the moment. This is not correct. An amendment to the Civil Procedure Rules has stayed all Part 55 possession actions for 90…
In light of the latest Government guidance on the coronavirus, a lot of our solicitors, secretaries and other staff are now working at home. We are doing interviews with clients including new clients by telephone from now on. However despite…
The NFL campaign have written to the 4 leadership and 5 deputy leadership candidates in the Labour Party leadership process. We have asked whether they support the recommendations of the campaign. We will let folks know about what responses we…
CLP have now submitted their final response to this consultation. Please see the attached document.
London Borough of Bromley v Persons Unknown, London Gypsies and Travellers and others  EWCA Civ 12
As many readers will know, London Borough of Bromley (‘Bromley’) appealed to the County Court against the refusal of “a de facto boroughwide prohibition of encampment and entry/occupation…in relation to all accessible public spaces in Bromley” ( in the words of Ms Ann-Leigh Mulcahy QC, sitting as a deputy judge of the High Court, when refusing the injunction). Some 38 similar injunctions have been granted by the High Court in recent years. In the Bromley case, London Gypsies and Travellers (LGT) intervened represented by Marc Willers QC and Tessa Buchanan of Garden Court Chambers and CLP (all acting substantially pro bono). This was, therefore, the first case involving such an injunction in which the Gypsy and Traveller community were represented before the High Court. As a result of the success of LGT in getting the wide injunction discharged (an injunction just against fly tipping and depositing waste was granted), this was also the first case to be argued out at appellate level. At Court of Appeal level Liberty and seven other local authorities also intervened.